Unexpected Things About Modern Writers
We often think of modern writers as accessible.
They’re alive. Interviewed. Online, sometimes. Their books sit closer to us — in time, in language, in reference.
And yet, even here, there are small, unexpected details that don’t quite fit the image we have of them.
The more you notice them, the more the writing begins to feel… human again.
Haruki Murakami runs marathons
Murakami wakes early, writes for a few hours, and then runs.
Not casually — consistently. Long distances. Repetition. Discipline.
It’s easy to see the connection once you know it. His writing has rhythm. Endurance. A certain quiet persistence that feels less like inspiration and more like practice.
Almost like he’s training for the novel.
Sally Rooney doesn’t write to be “liked”
Rooney’s characters are often difficult. Detached. Observant in ways that can feel uncomfortable.
That’s intentional.
She’s spoken about not trying to make characters agreeable — only honest. Which is probably why her work feels so precise. It doesn’t soften itself for approval.
It just stays with you.
Margaret Atwood helped design a device to sign books remotely
Atwood once worked on something called the LongPen — a device that allows authors to sign books from anywhere in the world.
It feels oddly fitting.
A writer known for imagining the future… quietly building a small piece of it.
Stephen King writes every single day
King writes every day, including birthdays and holidays.
His rule is simple: keep going.
He doesn’t wait for the right mood. He builds it through repetition. Which makes his output less mysterious, and in a strange way, more impressive.
Consistency, not intensity.
Elena Ferrante chose to remain completely anonymous
In a time where visibility is almost expected, Ferrante chose absence.
No public appearances. No confirmed identity. No face attached to the work.
And yet, her books travel everywhere.
It changes how you read them. There’s nothing to anchor the writing to — just the voice itself.
Colleen Hoover built her readership online before becoming mainstream
Before the scale, the charts, the visibility — there was the internet.
Hoover’s early readership grew through direct connection with readers. Conversations, communities, recommendations that felt personal.
It’s a different kind of literary path.
Less institutional. More immediate.
In the End
Maybe the idea of a “writer” hasn’t changed as much as we think.
The tools have. The visibility has. The speed of everything around books has.
But the work still comes down to small, repeated acts.
Waking up early. Writing a page. Going for a run. Staying anonymous. Showing up again the next day.
The books may feel contemporary.
But the process — quietly — remains the same.
Leave a comment
Please note, comments must be approved before they are published